Get Over It
October 8, 2010
It's gotten to the point where hearing about how fed up people are about the decline of arts reviews in the press is becoming boring and not helpful in terms of finding a solution to replace the loss.
"I miss newspapers," gripes Ron Evans in a recent blog post on the Arts Marketing Bog Salon. "No, I know we still have some daily, weekly, and other newspapers around the country (and my hat goes off to those still working in this field. I also miss hats). But the decline of arts journalism has been massive over the last few years. There are only a few newspapers left in the country that have dedicated arts reviewers/writers - writers who can be trusted to at least publicly declare that they continue to follow journalistic standards. And that's sad. It's sad, because nothing good has risen up to replace them."
I heard a similar cri-de-coeur this morning in a phone interview with the head of a cabaret organization in New York, who blames the loss of media coverage as playing a major role in killing off cabaret as an art form and cabaret venues. And I feel like I hear or read similar complaints every day.
People have been voicing such laments for about a decade now. Chafing at this point isn't going to bring back full-time arts critics at all the newspapers. It won't even bring back the newspapers. The fact is that the media landscape is irrevocably changing and we need to look to new alternatives for trusted, engaging writing and thinking about the arts. The blogosphere is full of people who aren't trustworthy as commentators. But I don't think it'll be long before trustworthy commentators rise to the top. It just takes time and patience for this to happen.
1 Comments:
I appreciate what you have written, but I think it misses at least one important point. I am less concerned with the loss of a specific medium than I am with the loss (or deterioration) of journalism as a professional practice. This is the issue that David Simon continues to raise whenever he has a bully pulpit from which to preach it; and it is the issue that "innovation junkies" persistently ignore. It is all very well and good to believe that "trustworthy commentators" will "rise to the top;" but whence come the skilled work practices through which they establish both their trust and the stylistic quality of what they write? Ours is an age that is losing the ability to distinguish signal from noise and believes that this problem can be relegated to "the wisdom of crowds." This is such a befuddled premise that people can no longer recognize its absurdity, just like the absurdity of the Naked Emperor.
By Stephen Smoliar, At October 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home